Recent awareness and media coverage about climatic change may have diverted consideration and financing from biodiversity, a group of scientists proposed. The group led a substance investigation of daily paper in four US broadsheets and four UK broadsheets. They reviewed project funding by the World Bank and National Science Foundation.
In a research published by Journal Bioscience, Kent conservationists also suggest that to prevent biodiversity from becoming a declining priority, they recommend that there is a need to leverage the importance of climate change across the world and attract more funds and draw attention to other important areas such as biodiversity protection.
Among their findings the team discovered that:
- Attention of media was steady toward biodiversity till 1990, but the extent of environmental change reports climbed before 2007 and has stayed substantial higher than biodiversity since 2005.
In investigative diaries, papers on loss of biodiversity and preservation have expanded at an enduring pace, but publication of papers on environmental change quickened extraordinarily around 2006 and surpassed them.
- Funding by the World Bank demonstrates no obvious change in the past 20 years, with environmental change project funded at a much more prominent rate than biodiversity projects. The US National Science Foundation's ventures guided to environmental change examination have expanded considerably since 1987, yet biodiversity consumptions have expanded significantly less and have held unfaltering since 2004.
The scientists further propose that, given that many human activities are driving both environmental change and biodiversity loss, conservationists ought to go for win-win results, for example, the United Nations program Redd+ (a growth of the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and backwoods Degradation program) - an activity that protects forests while making profits for neighborhood groups and biodiversity.